Howie Hanson’s e-blogÂ today includedÂ Yvonne Prettner-Solon’s explanation for the absence of the DECC from the Senate’s bonding bill.
I’ve googled for “bloggers,” “columnists,” and “pundits” but haven’t found a comprehensive list of know-it-alls. Somehow this seems like a serious oversight. Sure you can google individual names and get random information on just about any of them but there ought to be a ranking kind of like the ones for politicians. Anyone up to putting one together?
Its not a comprehensive listÂ but the NSNC has been electing a columnist for their hall of fame for ten years or so. They don’t publish a membership list.
Here’s a list of columnists. Some of the links actually work. The list doesn’t tell you anything about the politics of the writers only the publication or blog they are associated with. There are lots of missing names.
- Â Â Â
- Alex Beam (Boston Globe)
- Richard Benedetto (USA Today)
- Alan Bernstein (Houston Chronicle)
- Walt Brasch (Syndicated)
- David S. Broder (Washington Post)
- William F. Buckley Jr. (National Review)
- Margaret Carlson (Time)
- Steve Chapman (Chicago Tribune)
- Richard Cohen (Washington Post)
- Gail Collins (NY Times)
- Joe Conason (NY Observer)
- Maureen Dowd (NY Times)
- Ellen Goodman (Boston Globe)
- Nat Hentoff (Jewish World Review)
- Arianna Huffington (Syndicated)
- Molly Ivins (Fort Worth Star-Telegram)
- Al Kamen (Washington Post)
- Mickey Kaus (kausfiles.com)
- Michael Kelly (Washington Post)
- Larry King (USA Today)
- Morton M. Kondracke (Roll Call)
- Charles Krauthammer (Washington Post)
- Howard Kurtz (Washington Post)
- Mary McGrory (Washington Post)
- Mary Mitchell (Chicago Sun-Times)
- Peggy Noonan (Wall Street Journal)
- Robert Novak (Chicago Sun-Times)
- Tom Oliphant (Boston Globe)
- John O’Sullivan (Chicago Sun-Times)
- Clarence Page (Chicago Tribune)
- Camille Paglia (Salon.com)
- William Raspberry (Washington Post)
- Jonathan Rauch (National Journal)
- William Safire (NY Times)
- Robert J. Samuelson (Washington Post)
- Mark Shields (Creators Syndicate)
- Thomas Sowell (Jewish World Review)
- Tony Snow (Townhall.com)
- Andrew Sullivan (andrewsullivan.com)
- Howard Wilkinson (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- George F. Will (Washington Post)
- Jules Witcover (Baltimore Sun)
In my continuing search for a pundit glossary I ran across an interesting article on ranking Presidents in the Opinion Journal. Written just beforeÂ last year’s election it found that a survey of historians equally balanced between Democrats and Republicans putÂ George W BushÂ squarely in the middle of the Presidential pack. Of course, it was a little premature. There is no historical distance yet forÂ an objectiveÂ judgement.
I think Bush’s rankingÂ will decline steadily over time. The year since the election has done nothing to enhance his prospects for a generous appraisal.
A couple posts ago I commented that most political blogs, no matter how much they criticize the MSM (mainstream media) depend upon it for content and context. I was looking for a who’s who of pundits and periodicals that I could link to for people trying to figure out how tell what the prejudices the writers approached their writing from. I haven’t found one yet but I did find a two year old list of the top 16 new sites that bloggers linked to in 2003.
It probably hasn’t changed much in two years.
A friend sent me the latest Washington Monthly for this article. I found it online. Republican strategists made plans to have the Republican party maintain its power for a generation. It was less ambitious than the Nazi’s who talked about a thousand-year Reich but if this story is any indication it may not even last a generation.
Even though I’ve been an agnostic since junior high, the time I spend in church every Sunday is important to me. My wife, who has been my Sunday School teacher for better than a decade, intends to go to seminary when she retires in a few years. That should be an adventure.
Today weÂ began a month-long study of the Old Testament’s books of History. I’ve alwaysÂ been intriguedÂ with the idea God took Israel away from one set of inhabitantsÂ to give it to the Hebrews. After Rome crushed Israel in about 60 AD Hebrews had to wait 1,900 years to reclaim Israel from the Palestinians whoÂ had occupied it during the diaspora.Â
Politicial science has a fancy word for the dreams of a people to return to their ancient homelands. Its called irredentism and Jews are not the only irredentists. Over the weekend a small band of irridentist North Americans joined much larger numbers of Hispanics who were protesting the treatment of immigrants in the United States. This small bandÂ waved placards claiming America for themselves as decendents of the Maya, Aztec and otherÂ native peoples.
It seems to me thatÂ the IndianÂ claims on North America have as much validity as the Hebrew claim on Isreal, or to put it another way, no better claim -Â except for one thing -Â the Jewish people’s have reclaimed Israel through war and treaty.
There is one fly in the ointment for Jewish Israel. Jewish Israelies don’t have as many babies as Palestinian Israelies. This means that at some time in the future they could be out voted by Palestinians who might wish to act on their own irredentism.
Would the United States support the claims of such a democratic majority if it were to exert itself? This strikes me as a good question to ask on the Sabbath.
General Zinni, former Commander of Central Command, on Meet the Press today:
“. . . ever since the end of the first Gulf War, there’s been planning by serious officers and planners and others, and policies put in place – 10 years’ worth of planning were thrown away. Troop levels dismissed out of hand. Gen. Shinseki basically insulted for speaking the truth and giving an honest opinion.” Video-WMP Video-QT
I still have 55 minutes to put an entry into the ole blog today. Daylight savings will trim an hour off of tonight’s sleep which means I’ll have to get out of bed early to readÂ my Sunday School Lesson.
There were no earlier blog entries because I was out of town and I haven’t yet figured out how to blog by email. We left for the Twin Cities yestereday so that I could pick up several cases of wine from Haskell’s “Nickle Sale.” This is the result ofÂ the new hobby which I picked up after my children left the nest and I no longer had to set a good example.
I had just finished insulating the last wall of my “wine cellar” so that the summer temperatures wouldn’t jump up and down so wildly this year. That’s bad for wine. I had researched some recent wine competitions to see what wines had gotten good ratings and compared them with Haskell’s prices. WhenÂ a gold rating coincided with a really inexpensive bottle of wine I put it on my list. MyÂ aim is to becomeÂ become a cheap wine, wine snob. It was nice to come back home tonight and fill the holes that had accumulated over the winter in my wine racks.
We had dinner last night with my daughter and son-in-law at W. A. Frost. Located on Selby Street in the shadow of St. Paul’s CathedralÂ Frost isÂ pricey but worth every penny.
Today before we stopped at Haskels we made a quick stop at the Walker Art Center. It occurred to me, as I looked at a series of very well crafted sculpturesÂ of humans emerging from the birth canals of various animals that museums are much better places to exhibit some contemporary art than a person’s home.
We also made a stop at Como’s Zoo’sÂ conservatory and inhaled the heady bouquet of clorophyll. The flowers in the sunken garden were bright colorful and made one yearn for Spring.
That’s it. No politics today.Â We got home andÂ I picked up a Reader to see my column in print. I couldn’t bring myself to read much of the April Fool’s content however because some writers don’t really understand the difference between parody and cruelty. Hey, I’ll happily eviscerate anyone who really deserves it but suggesting that a youthful looking politician is being recruited by a castrati choir . . . that’sÂ just mean!
A new television program will soon be showing an apparently happy polygamous family. If, one might ask, if gay marriages are OK why not marriages with multiple partners? A very thoughtful article on the why nots starting with all the men who won’t get wives.
“The problem in China and India is sex-selective abortion (and sometimes infanticide), not polygamy; where the marriage market is concerned, however, the two are functional equivalents. In their book, Hudson and den Boer note that “bare branches are more likely than other males to turn to vice and violence.” To get ahead, they “may turn to appropriation of resources, using force if necessary.” Such men are ripe for recruitment by gangs, and in groups they “exhibit even more exaggerated risky and violent behavior.” The result is “a significant increase in societal, and possibly intersocietal, violence.”
Crime rates, according to the authors, tend to be higher in polygynous societies. Worse, “high-sex-ratio societies are governable only by authoritarian regimes capable of suppressing violence at home and exporting it abroad through colonization or war.” In medieval Portugal, “the regime would send bare branches on foreign adventures of conquest and colonization.” (An equivalent today may be jihad.) In 19th-century China, where as many as 25 percent of men were unable to marry, “these young men became natural recruits for bandit gangs and local militia,” which nearly toppled the government. In what is now Taiwan, unattached males fomented regular revolts and became “entrepreneurs of violence.”
This sounds a lot like what’s happening in much of sub-saharan Africa today.
From the DNT by way of the Orlando Sentinal
“When Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies, posted data on the NASA Web site indicating that 2005 could be the warmest year on record, agency officials ordered him to withdraw the information because it had not been screened in advance.
A political appointee in NASA’s public affairs office, George Deutsch, tried to limit reporters’ access to Hansen. Deutsch resigned after revelations that he had padded his resume.”
I wonder if he trained Arabian horses too?
Wisconsin native Daniel Fanning writes eloquently in the DNT of his frustration over our flawed policies in Iraq where he was stationed as a first sergeant.In summary:“Throughout my year all over Iraq, I consistently felt a great deal of pride in my fellow soldiers, but I also felt a great deal of shame for the politics and politicians that placed us in such an unfortunate situation.”
and yet Serteant Fanning adds:
“Given the magnitude of this situation, however, we cannot simply pull out immediately, either. I believe a gradual, calculated withdrawal must begin immediately. If we are truly interested in leaving Iraq a better place, we should work just as hard to bring clean water and electricity as we do to bring freedom and democracy.”
The Minnesota Department of Revenue revealed the depressing news that the tax payers of Duluth are way behind the rest of the state’s taxpayers in filing their taxes over the Internet. While 63% of state taxpayers file by Internet only 38% of Duluthians do. Its speculated that this is because of Duluth’s high proportion of senior citizens who are not connected or comfortable with the Internet. Well Duh!
This also means that a lot of the audience I would like to reach through this medium won’t notice anything I upload. Curses!
When I’m ninty and still blogging that won’t be a problem any more. I just hope I’m not too crippled up with arthritis to type. Of course, by that time my dragon voice recognition software will take care of that.
Among the sites I visit almost daily is NASA’s Cassini mission. Every week wonderful and breathtaking new images of Saturn and its neighborhood are made available. This is a fun little video of this remote world.
Its nice to know that whatever problems we inflict on each other here on Earth we have accomplishments like Cassini to remind us of what we can do when we get our act together.
Enforce Immigration Laws Already on the Books
Morning Edition, March 30, 2006 · Commentator Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies says he doesn’t support any of the measures Congress is considering on immigration. Instead, he says the U.S. should simply enforce the law it already has banning the employment of illegal immigrants.
Bush red states November 2004
Bush red states March 2006
I forecast this.
Nonetheless, Democrats can’t take anything for granted.
Unlike a lot of bloggers I like newspapers. Without the MSM (mainstream media) a great many of the bloggers who fancy themselves pundits would have little to say. My friend Tom West had it about right in a column he wrote for his little publication the Budgeteer last week. He pointed out that most of what the blogging community writes about originally came from newspapers.
Having an opinion is easy. Having someone else’s opinion is even easier. Since the Republican paranoia about the press bubbled over in the 1980’s Republican’s believe that all reporters are liberal and report accordingly That’s what group think will do once it has you in its grip.
Yes, reporters tend to be liberal. Surveys of reporters have borne this out. I think it comes from their college liberal arts degrees. The “liberal” in liberal arts means well-rounded more than it means politically liberal. In fact, that’s long been one of the aims of liberal arts colleges compared to community colleges or trade schools. Liberal arts graduates are expected to read widely, if shallowly, about a great many things.
I’ve always been struck by how many reporters, no matter how politically liberal, take their educations and turn it into healthy skepticism. Most have been quite open to conservative criticism of big government and our permissive society. I think its much more accurate to describe journalists as pragmatists rather than as polemicists let alone liberal polemicists. The blogging community on the other hand has a lot more polemicists. What is a polemicist? Think of them as being persuaders or, if you prefer, propogandists.
Because young people are abandoning newspapers in favor of second hand but free blogs I’m a little worried about our future. So, long as they don’t retreat into something like Fox News simply to have their prejudices reinforced America will likely survive this phenomenon and retain its open minded and vibrant culture.
Now that that’s off my chest, I can go back to my polemics.
My cousin’s husband designed an experiment that got written up in the Washington Post. Using a whack-a-mole game with celebrities, dictators and American politicians he demonstrated the virulent ill will of Democrats and Republicans toward each other’s leaders. When they played the game with half Republican and half Democrat politicians they were so intent on whacking the opposition that they got low scores.
Independents did better because they didn’t play favorites and were equal opportunity whackers. There was more to the study but my blog is quite
content with this synopsis.
Tom DeLay, humble as always, tells “THE WAR ON CHRISTIANS” conference; “Sides are being chosen, and the future of man hangs in the balance!” … “The enemies of virtue may be on the march, but they have not won, and if we put our trust in Christ, they never will.”
DeLay’s Christians will win when the world ends and they go to heaven during the Rapture. (I hope they don’t discover that the jihadists got there first and got first dibs on the virgins) The enemies warring against DeLay’s Christians are folks like me who are trying to prevent the Republicans from terracide.
More examples of Republican, er Christian, policies: