Re: the WSJ evaluation in the last post I got a tough little rejoinder in my email. For those of you in my vast readership who, like my buddy, read almost everthing I post, Thank you. For those who would vicariously enjoy seeing me get my hinder kicked this is for you:
Oh, Harry. I pay several hundred dollars a year for my subscription to The Wall Street Journal, but I seldom read its editorials. I pay nothing to read lincolndemocrat.com, but I read most of what is written there. However, I consider The Wall Street Journal to be a much more valuable source of information and opinion, than lincolndemocrat.com. Editorials are editorials, and bullshit is bullshit. Bullshit can be found almost anywhere, including at lincolndemocrat.com. And yes, you would be correct to infer that I’m thinking that The Wall Street Journal at its worst, is not nearly as bad as lincolndemocrat at its worst.
Rupert doesn’t pay me to wiretap my sources or to pay them hush money when they threaten to sue me for it. He doesn’t pay for my BS either.
