- Activity Chart
- Says
- Copies
Experience Schedule
Seemingly the design concerns is resolved additionally the execution is significantly less than remark. Should the RFC getting booked having dialogue in the TechCom?
Apparently the proper execution concerns was resolved as well as the execution was not as much as opinion. Should the RFC feel planned to possess conversation at the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- The newest proposition on task dysfunction is fairly distinctive from what could have been accompanied. Because of it to advance given that an RFC, the work breakdown must be upgraded to help you mirror whatever you happen to be considering.
- We don’t know if it is recommended purely since a 3rd class function, or for deployment towards WMF systems. If it is for only third events, it may not even you prefer an RFC, and will maybe be done as an extension too. In case it is to possess WMF manufacturing, we will have to look carefully on the ramifications to own caching and you can performance.
Evidently the proper execution concerns is solved and implementation is actually lower than feedback. Should the RFC end up being arranged to own dialogue during the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- The fresh suggestion on the task dysfunction is quite not the same as just what could have been observed. For this to succeed since a keen RFC, the work malfunction has to be current to help you echo everything we seem to be considering.
- Do not determine if this can be proposed strictly given that a third group ability, or even for implementation towards the WMF solutions. If it’s for 3rd functions, it may not actually you prefer an RFC, and can even possibly performed as the an extension as well. If it is to possess WMF creation, we will see to appear carefully to your implications getting caching and you will performance.
W.r.t. #step 1 – The form enjoys indeed evolved quite a bit as we works which have on part anchor alot more usable and you can intuitive. We are able to posting brand new dysfunction on the RFC. #2 – Does “deployment with the WMF expertise” indicate while making it section of MediaWiki core software? I think it offers always been the fresh new presumption, that’s the reason it’s got been through many iterations out-of structure, i18n and perf improvement π You’ll WMF loved ones chime directly into confirm this is exactly nonetheless the fresh circumstances?
#2 – Does “deployment to the WMF options” indicate and also make that it element of MediaWiki key application? I do believe it has got always been the newest expectation, that is the reason it’s experienced of a lot iterations from design, i18n and perf update π You will WMF household members chime into establish this is nonetheless this new case?
It indicates providing it to your about some of the WMF websites. Whether it’s part of center or an extension is not so related. The original RFC could have been recorded to your concept of which have so it let for the Wikipedia and you will relatives, but I want to enjoys specific keyword thereon in the associated WMF everyone.
18+ discuter
- We don’t determine if this might be suggested strictly once the a third people element, or implementation into the WMF assistance. If it’s just for 3rd people, it may not even you prefer a keen RFC, and may maybe performed since an extension as well. When it is to own WMF development, we will have to appear carefully into the implications for caching and you can abilities.
Giving a scientific angle: the modern implementation of this particular aspect utilizes certain change so you’re able to the newest Parser output therefore the Body layout, hence want alter on core. To help you accomplish a similar for the an expansion, around nevertheless must be specific change in the fresh new core – specifically to own anchor viewpoints into SkinEditSectionLinks link (for example all of the change except the real incorporating of one’s ‘share’ connect would have to enter the core in any event). In my opinion thanks to this it can make much more feel to possess it since a core change. It’s still configurable by way of $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare globally, that is of by default. When the value is actually false, no additional logic or JavaScript/CSS tips is invoked by the function.