With regards to the “constant idea of thinking about brief-label and enough time-identity mating because not-being reverse poles”, i already put this notion in the previous version of this new manuscript (now during the pp. 4-5, contours 91-108):
It antique look at mating direction has been criticized by the some experts, such Jackson and you may Kirkpatrick , who advertised you to small-term and you may long-title orientation don’t need to feel other posts, however, dimensions one to, when you are adversely related, will likely be differentiated. More boffins demonstrated brand new appropriateness regarding abandoning brand new antique unidimensional posture off short-label orientations and listening to a multidimensional perspective . age., earlier sociosexual decisions), attitudes (i.e., thinking regarding the casual intercourse), and desire (we.age., stimulation due to possibility of everyday sex). However, it’s still prominent one to researchers consistently data mating strategies such as for example face-to-face posts and sociosexuality away from a beneficial unidimensional means after they learn demographic correlates.
“A condition for being an effective option would be one to matchmaking software profiles are much time-identity depending otherwise, no less than, for as long-title mainly based due to the fact general inhabitants.” So it question is none become managed, nor replied regarding the sample, find next area.
Response: After the their testimonial i’ve altered which phrase (pp. 5-six, outlines 128-130): “A condition if you are a beneficial solution is that dating applications users was much time-name based or, about, provided that-name founded given that low-users”. However, you will find not been able to select the “second part” that has been strongly related this matter. Ergo, we just changed this problem about your very first an element of the reviewer’s comment.
A major section is the saying to possess generalizability of decide to try while you are there had been several exceptions made: Once: Age was limited out-of 18 to help you twenty-six.
Response: Many thanks for their comment. We’re being unsure of about what is the problem with the past take to age. From our skills, there are two main alternatives. First, our very own sample cannot be general to population. I totally go along with which. For this casualdates prijs reason why, currently in the previous sorts of the newest manuscript, we included in the Dialogue point (today in p. fifteen, contours 336-340):
Most other limitations was basically pertaining to the fresh new representativeness of the test and you may this new generalization of show. Among the many finally members, the new decide to try was primarily girls, old between 18 and you can twenty six, single and from just one college or university, making the abilities tough to generalize to all college students and, still reduced to help you young non-students.
Second, when your issue is so you’re able to exclude those external you to definitely age range, it choice is made become uniform and coherent on the inclusion requirements regarding early in the day training held having university trials (get a hold of, such as for example: Barrada ainsi que al., 2018; Barrada et al., 2019; Castro and you may Santos-Iglesias, 2016; Castro mais aussi al., 2020; Fernandez del Rio mais aussi al., 2019). That it looks from the breakdown of your study’s inclusion conditions (today, inside p. 6, contours 144-19). I made a decision to remain consistent around the education to attenuate researchers’ degree away from versatility and you will, thus, prevent possible p-hacking. This new exception criteria regarding the many years try preset and you may uniform in most all of our studies.
This consists of sociosexual decisions (i
Second: Only anybody considering by themselves because the men or women was in fact used in the newest analyses (nevertheless they might be dropped and you can considered as missing in the regression).
Thus, like, you can focus a steady dating and you will, when you find yourself trying it, take care of numerous sexual dating instead of union [27,28]
Response: As for individuals who don’t choose themselves given that males otherwise female, as well as rise above the crowd regarding the part Users (now, from inside the p. 6, lines 144-19), there have been 13 individuals from a first shot of 1,996, which means 0.65% of these decide to try. Because of the small-size associated with the test from professionals (currently really small prior to almost every other exclusion standards was in fact used), it was ple. That have like a limited attempt dimensions, analytical fuel might possibly be suprisingly low. Including, this is not possible to combine this community that have any of both most gender identities.