A special kind of scoring brand new Extended Individual Characteristics Survey (EPAQ) was used to evaluate the latest constructs out-of negative and positive androgyny. This new EPAQ is administered to help you 196 adult people; their solutions was in fact classified on a differentiated androgyny. Tall differences had been obtained ranging from negative and positive androgynous somebody just like the really due to the fact anywhere between positive and negative female and you can positive and negative masculine some body to your a collection of measures out-of mental health insurance and well-are. These types of conclusions support the validity and you can electricity out-of differentiating androgyny to your negative and positive types of gender character identity.
Sources
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self confidence since the a function of manliness in both men and women. Journal away from Contacting and you can Health-related Psychology, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, Letter. (1981). An Australian Sex Part Scale. Australian Journal off Psychology, 33, 169-183.
Baril, G., Elbert, N., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Is actually androgynous professionals extremely more beneficial? Class and you may Organization Studies, 14, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). Toward electric off solution measures into determining of emotional androgyny, Record out-of Consulting and you may Systematic Therapy, forty-five, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). This new transgender paradigm move for the totally free term. During the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Sex merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Sex character variations in sensitiveness for the dictate out-of support availability into despair. Log away from Identification, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Enjoy from the anyone else and its particular regards to acceptance away from care about and you may others: A good revaluation. Log of Abnormal and Personal Mindset, fifty, 274-276.
Environmentally friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The attractiveness of gender type traits at some other relationship levels: Androgynous qualities can be desirable anyway. Journal out of Identification and Public Psychology, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, Good. (1981a). Intercourse variations in the functional linkage between androgyny, personal knowledge, and you may ability. Diary out of Identification and you will Social Psychology, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). Quick particular the latest Tx Public Behavior Directory, an objective way of measuring self-value. Bulletin of your Psychometric Area, cuatro, 473-475.
Hoffman, R. (2001). The dimension away from manliness and you may femininity: Historic angle and you will ramifications getting therapy. Record regarding Counselling and you may Advancement, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The newest identification and you may translation out of correspondence outcomes anywhere between carried on details from inside the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Lookup, twenty five, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, Yards., Hansson, R. (1978). The newest enigma out of androgyny: Differential ramifications for males and female. Log out of Asking and you may Medical Mindset, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). This new formulations to have intercourse jobs and you can androgyny: A serious feedback. Diary out of Logical and Contacting Mindset, 45, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Sex spots and you will decision making for the demographically varied organizations: A case to own reviving androgyny. Intercourse Spots, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and expression away from outrage. Relationships with intercourse character socializing, depression and mental health working. Journal regarding Consulting Psychology, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, Elizabeth. (1991). Gender spots: The aspect regarding maleness, femininity, and you may androgyny. In J. Robinson, D. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Actions of personality and you may public psychological thinking (pp. 573-660). San diego, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A beneficial., Butcher, J. (1981). The connection ranging from androgyny and subjective indicators from psychological better-getting. Record off Character and you will Personal Mindset, 40, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, Good., Butcher, J. (1983). Maleness, womanliness and you may androgyny seen and you can analyzed due to the fact type of concepts. Diary from Identification and you will Social Therapy, 49, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny as well as relation to teenage psychological better-being: A review of the latest literature. Gender Positions, 21, 25-341.
Get, Good., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you will coping from inside the men with a beneficial managerial direction. Southern African Record out of Mindset, 27, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, A great. (1992). Kid’s sex penned attitudes out of physical exercise: Outcomes and ramifications. Perceptual and you can System Event, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., Yards. (1981). The newest Nowicki-Strickland Life time Locus out of Control Balances: Make validation. When you look at the H. Yards. Lefcourt (Ed.), Lookup with the locus out of handle build (Vol. 2, pp. 16-43). Ny: Informative Force.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you may low-stereotypic sex character characteristic and behavior orientations, gender title and mental improvement. Journal out of Identity and Public Therapy, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Gender and electricity. Inside P. Meters. Kalbfleisch Meters. J. Cody (Eds.), Intercourse, energy, and you can communications in human relationship (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Razor, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Methods out of character and you may personal mental attitudes. North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Flower, An excellent., Montemayor, R. (1994). The partnership anywhere between gender part positioning and thought worry about-competency during the male and female adolescents. Intercourse Spots, 30, 579-595.
Russell, Grams., Antill, J. (1984). An Australian gender-role level: Additional psychometric research and you will correlations that have notice-regard. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Yards. (1991). Aggression, sex character procedures and you will Kohut’s therapy of your notice. Gender Opportunities, twenty five, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology just like the a function of intimate positioning, sex, belief, and you will trait classes in long lasting dyadic matchmaking. Journal regarding Personality and Personal Therapy, 47, 983-1002.
Purchase solitary article
Shaver, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, Yards., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you may connection protection: Several relevant varieties of maximum personality. Identity and you may Personal Mindset Bulletin, twenty-two, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and profitable version across the expected life among Japanese adults. Diary regarding Hereditary Psychology, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Elizabeth. (1995). Sex role direction and its relationship to the development of title and moral envision. Scandinavian Diary away from Therapy, thirty-six, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Masculinity, womanliness, and you can sex-associated traits: An abstract data and you can complaints out-of latest browse. Progress from inside the Experimental Character Research, thirteen, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). Thirty years away from gender research: Your own chronicle. When you look at the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you will stereotypes within the society: The fresh intercourse research off erican Psychological Organization.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Crucial and you may expressive characteristics, trait stereotypes, and you will sexist attitudes: What do it denote? Therapy of females Every quarter, 24, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and good components of mental maleness and you will femininity and their link to worry about-records away from neurotic and you can acting out practices. Log out of Personality and you can Societal Therapy, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The personal Features Questionnaire: A measure of intercourse character stereotypes and you can maleness-womanliness. JSAS List regarding Chose Data in Mindset, cuatro, 43-49.
Stake, J. (1997). Partnering expressiveness and you can instrumentality in the real-world setup: A new position to the benefits of androgyny. Intercourse Positions, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, Meters., Hall, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An evaluation and you may reformulation of your own ideas, strategies, and you can results. Mental Bulletin, ninety five, 347-366.
West , C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Starting gender. In Meters. Kimmel (Ed.), New gendered people viewer (pp. 131-149). New york: Oxford College or university Drive.
Whitley, B. (1983). Sex part direction and you will mind-esteem: A serious meta-analytical feedback, Diary from Identification and Societal Therapy, 49, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (into the drive). Desirable and you will unwanted androgyny: A drugs towards twenty-basic 100 years. Record off Gender Education.
Wulff, Meters., Steitz, J. (1999). A course model of the relationship ranging from field indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and mind-regard. Perceptual and you may Motor Experience, 88, 935-940.