You happen to be looking Wikidata:Tools/Modify affairs#Move says dos – (UTC) Note that Wikidata:Tools/Revise circumstances#Flow says currently do what #2 authorized, thus need not play with one to. –Matej Suchanek ( chat ) , (UTC) Many thanks! .83 , (UTC)
One assistance is appreciated
492) users. It makes sense because a very commonly smoother process and because around already is obtainable a unique gizmo for moving sitelinks. –SilentSpike ( talk ) , (UTC)
- Maybe query Matej_Suchanek : when the he could be ok on it? (I use it and that i highly recommend it) — Jura , (UTC)
- A section, i’m sorry having and when, but is it possible you enter rather have from the Matej_Suchanek : ? –SilentSpike ( talk ) , (UTC)
- We contain the circulate. Thierry Caro ( cam ) , (UTC)
- Monday (- UTC)
- Wednesday (- UTC)
- Thursday (- UTC)
- Monday (- UTC)
Oduci ( chat ) , (UTC) – repaired a mistake within my link Oduci ( cam ) , (UTC)
I would fool around with begin day (P580) to possess space the new go out where in actuality the earliest chat try presented on the IWantU dating website Tuesday and you may avoid big date (P582) getting storing the go out where in fact the past speak is showed on the Monday. Yet not, I don’t know property to have storage every piece of information for the Wednesday or Thursday.
See Assist:Dates#Reliability, unfortunately currently restriction accuracy of time are day. Jklamo ( talk ) , (UTC) I don’t consider Wikidata is suitable for it particular facts. — Jura , (UTC)
Good morning other wikipedians, I found myself trying to connect the fresh french (fr) webpage Blais on english (en) one to. It’s currently connected to the italian language (de) and you may italian (it) pages to own Blais but it does not functions, because the “a comparable identity pertaining to pagename Blais along with property p1889 try mentioned since the additional” because claimed for me because of the phabricator. Thank you for your notice –Ricercastorica ( speak ) , (UTC)
Ricercastorica : You will find moved the new dentro de wiki sitelink from Blais (Q21482871) in order to Blais (Q15989234), which forms out the recognized problem. unlike (P1889) has been doing exactly what it says into tin: specifying you to something having a good disambiguation webpage isn’t the just like the item to own a family term. It will be a good, btw, to provide backlinks whenever reporting points right here or else. –Tagishsimon ( speak ) , (UTC)
ie. the house or property to possess software type identifier (P348) does not render an error into worth 4.15-rc8 even though at the same time for this really worth “step 1.0.0.4-rc4” there is certainly a layout constraint content stating that this won’t match the format limitation. Is the situation that the format restriction can’t handle over dos opinions split because of the a good radix profile (Q6575377) / “.” character?
Yeah, no, I’m not holding that question. It is alternatively unbelievable as the a masterpiece, and asa proof you to typical expressions are simpler to create than simply discover. But what’s the mission, really? Folks accounts for their own format, whenever do you believe you really have taken into account all of the choices, somebody names their 2nd type junior. Simply disregard the warningL you have got double-looked that really worth is valid, and also the limitation have type-of found its mission. Whether or not it factors your sleepless evening, incorporate it a different (otherwise incorporate |(\d+\.)*\d+-rc\d+ for the avoid of the regex). Karl Oblique ( chat ) , (UTC)
Hey, some items provides a weird identity, which seems to have come copied regarding Swedish identity. Come across elizabeth.grams. Q21871428 or Rauchkogel (Q21878466). From inside the Austria alone I came across > 1300 such as names: Inquire. Notified new robot that presumingly brought about you to definitely disease, towards the robot operator it looks is fine. Will there be a possibility aside from doing it me to fix such as for example dilemmas? better –Herzi Pinki ( chat ) , (UTC)