Article 14. an intentional criminal activity is a criminal activity constituted due to clear knowledge any particular one’s own work may cause socially dangerous consequences, as well as a cure for or indifference to your event of these effects.

Unlawful obligation will be borne for deliberate crimes.

Article 15. a crime that is negligent whenever one should foresee this 1’s work could potentially cause socially dangerous effects but does not achieve this as a result of carelessness or, having foreseen the results, easily assumes they can avoid them, utilizing the outcome why these consequences happen.

Unlawful obligation will be borne for negligent crimes only if the statutory legislation so stipulates.

Article 16. Although a work objectively produces harmful effects, it is not a crime if it does not result from intent or negligence but rather stems from irresistible or unforeseeable causes.

Article 17. An individual who has now reached the chronilogical age of eighteen whom commits a crime shall keep responsibility that is criminal.

Somebody who has now reached the chronilogical age of fourteen yet not the chronilogical age of eighteen whom commits the crimes of intentionally killing another or deliberately hurting another, also causing severe damage or death, in addition to crimes of rape, robbery, medication trafficking, arson, explosion, and poisoning shall keep responsibility that is criminal.

An individual who has now reached the chronilogical age of fourteen although not the chronilogical age of eighteen whom commits a criminal activity will probably be provided an inferior punishment or a mitigated punishment.

Whenever an individual is not criminally penalized him to discipline because he has not reached the age of eighteen, the head of his family or guardian is to be ordered to subject. When needed, he might additionally be provided shelter and rehabilitation by the federal government.

Article 18. a mentally sick one who causes dangerous consequences at any given time as he is not able to recognize or struggling to get a grip on his or her own conduct is certainly not to keep unlawful duty after being founded through certification of appropriate procedures; but their family members or guardian will be ordered to topic him to strict surveillance and request their hospital treatment. Whenever necessary, he can be provided with compulsory hospital treatment by the federal government.

An individual whoever psychological infection is of an intermittent nature shall keep unlawful obligation if he commits a criminal activity during a time period of psychological normality.

A mentally sick one who commits a criminal activity at any given time as he have not yet totally lost their capability to recognize or get a handle on their own conduct shall keep unlawful obligation but he might get a smaller or a mitigated punishment.

An intoxicated individual who commits a crime shall keep responsibility that is criminal.

Article 19. A deaf-mute or a person that is blind commits a crime could be given an inferior punishment or perhaps a mitigated punishment or be exempted from punishment.

Article 20. Unlawful obligation is certainly not become borne for the work of genuine protection that is under taken up to stop current illegal infringement associated with the state’s and general public interest or the legal rights of this person, home or any other liberties associated with star or of other individuals and that causes problems for the illegal infringer.

Unlawful duty will be borne where genuine defense significantly surpasses the required restrictions and results in harm that is great. But, consideration will probably be provided to imposing a mitigated punishment or to granting exemption from punishment.

Unlawful obligation isn’t become borne for a protective act undertaken against ongoing real attack, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap, along with other violent crimes that really endanger personal security that triggers damage or death into the illegal infringer since this kind of act isn’t a defense that is excessive.

Article 21. Unlawful obligation isn’t become borne for harm caused by a work of urgent danger prevention that really must be undertaken so that you can avert the incident of current risk to your state or interest that is public the liberties of the individual, property legal rights, or other legal rights for the star or of others.

Criminal duty will be borne where urgent danger avoidance surpasses the mandatory restrictions and results in harm that is undue. Nonetheless, consideration will be provided in line with the circumstances to imposing a mitigated punishment or to granting exemption from punishment.