Getting finest readability, i make use of the notation defined for the [RIF-DTB], that offers shortcuts to have writing Iris

Getting finest readability, i make use of the notation defined for the [RIF-DTB], that offers shortcuts to have writing Iris

The first shortcut notation lets one write long rif:iri constants in the form prefix:identity, where prefix is a short name that old boyfriendpands into an IRI according to a suitable Prefix directive. For instance, ex:kid would expand into the rif:iri constant ""^^rif:iri, if ex is defined as in the Prefix(ex . ) directive below. The second shortcut notation uses angle brackets as a way to shorten the ". "^^rif:iri idiom. For instance, the prevous rif:iri constant can be alternatively represented as < The last shortcut notation lets one write rif:iri constants using IRIs relative to a base, where the base IRI is specified in a directive. For instance, with the directive, below, both and "Yorick"^^rif:iri expand into the rif:iri constant ""^^rif:iri. The example also illustrates attachment of annotations.

The above mentioned RIF algorithms try (admittedly uncomfortable) analytical renderings of your following statements regarding Shakespeare’s Hamlet: “Anything try spoiled in the condition from Denmark,” “As, or perhaps not to be,” and you can “All kid has company and attract.”

Observe that the above set of formulas has a nested subset with its own annotation, , which contains only a global IRI. ?

Ft

The first document, below, imports https://datingranking.net/bbwcupid-review/ the second document, which is assumed to be located at the IRI In addition, the first document has references to two remote modules, which are located at and correspondingly. These segments was thought as degree basics that provides the fresh new usual facts about university enrollment, programs offered in various other semesters, etc. The principles equal to brand new remote modules commonly found, because they do not show new features. Throughout the easiest situation, these studies basics could only be groups of affairs into the predicates/frames who supply the fresh necessary recommendations.

In this example, the main document contains three rules, which define the predicates u:requires, u:will teach and u:popular_direction. The information for the first two predicates is obtained by querying the remote modules corresponding to Universities 1 and 2. The rule that defines the first predicate says that if the remote university knowledge base says that a student s takes a course c in a certain semester s then takes(s c s) is true in the main document. The second rule makes a similar statement about professors teaching courses in various semesters. Inside the main document, the external modules are referred to via the terms _univ(1) and _univ(2). The Component directives tie these references to the actual locations. The underscore in front of univ signifies that this is a rif:regional symbol and is a shortcut for "univ"^^rif:regional, as defined in [RIF-DTB], Section Constants and Symbol Spaces. Note that the remote modules use frames to represent the enrollment information and predicates to represent course offerings. The rules in the main document convert both of these representations to predicates. The third rule illustrates a use of aggregation. The comprehension variable here is ?Stud and ?Crs is a grouping variable. Note that these are the only free variables in the formula over which aggregation is computed. For each course, the aggregate counts the number of students in that course over all semesters, and if the number exceeds 500 then the course is declared popular. Note also that the comprehension variable ?Stud is bound by the aggregate, so it is not quantified in the Forall-prefix of the rule.

We teach algorithms, including documents and you can groups, to the following the done example (that have apologies so you’re able to Shakespeare toward imperfect helping to make of meant definition inside logic)

The imported document has only one rule, which defines a new concept, u:studentOf (a student is a studentOf of a certain professor if that student takes a course from that professor). Since the main document imports the second document, it can answer queries about u:studentOf as if this concept were defined directly within the main document. ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *