- Activity Graph
- Says
- Copies
Experience Timeline
Seemingly the design concerns was resolved and execution is actually around remark. Should the RFC feel booked to own conversation on TechCom?
Apparently the proper execution inquiries is actually resolved together with implementation is actually under comment. If the RFC feel planned getting dialogue in the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- The new offer in the task malfunction is quite not the same as what could have been observed. For it to progress since a keen RFC, work dysfunction should be updated to reflect everything we are generally looking at.
- We do not know if this is recommended strictly due to the fact a 3rd class ability, and deployment toward WMF assistance. If it’s just for third events, it may not actually you want an RFC, that can maybe performed while the an extension too. If it’s for WMF production, we will have to appear very closely to your effects for caching and you can efficiency.
It seems that the proper execution questions was solved while the implementation is actually less than comment. Should the RFC become arranged having talk within TechCom?
18+ discuter
- New proposition in the activity breakdown is pretty not the same as just what might have been used. Because of it to advance due to the fact an enthusiastic RFC, the task breakdown has to be updated to mirror what we should are usually deciding on.
- Do not determine if this is suggested strictly once the a 3rd people feature, or for deployment towards WMF systems. If it is for just third functions, it might not actually you need an enthusiastic RFC, and may even perhaps be performed since an expansion too. If it is having WMF design, we will have to appear carefully towards ramifications to own caching and you can performance.
W.r.t. #1 – The proper execution has actually in reality advanced significantly as we works that have to the area anchor a whole lot more available and you will easy to use. We are able to update this new malfunction regarding the RFC. #dos – Do “implementation on WMF expertise” mean and work out which part of MediaWiki key application? I do believe it offers always been the presumption, that is the reason it has got been through of several iterations away from design, i18n and you can perf improve 🙂 You are going to WMF family unit members chime in to establish this can be still the newest circumstances?
#2 – Really does “implementation on WMF solutions” mean making that it element of MediaWiki center software? I believe it has got for ages been the new presumption, that is the reason it has got undergone of many iterations out of build, i18n and you can perf improve 🙂 Could WMF family members chime into confirm this might be however the newest circumstances?
This means providing they to the at the least a few of the WMF web sites. Whether it is section of center or an expansion isn’t really very relevant. The first RFC might have been recorded toward thought of which have that it enabled towards the Wikipedia and you will family, however, I’d like to possess explicit phrase on that in the related WMF men.
18+ discuter
- We do not determine if this is suggested purely while the a third party element, or even for deployment to the WMF https://besthookupwebsites.net/nl/420-dating-nl/ solutions. If it’s just for 3rd parties, it might not actually you prefer a keen RFC, and may even perhaps be performed while the an expansion also. In case it is to own WMF creation, we will have to appear carefully toward implications for caching and you may abilities.
Giving a scientific angle: the current implementation of this feature relies on certain changes in order to the brand new Parser yields as well as the Epidermis theme, which require transform toward center. So you’re able to doing a comparable inside an expansion, truth be told there nevertheless should be particular change in the new core – especially to offer the anchor values with the SkinEditSectionLinks hook up (and therefore most of the transform except the true incorporating of your own ‘share’ hook will have to enter the core anyway). I think for that reason it will make more sense to own which given that a core alter. It’s still configurable using $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare internationally, that is of automagically. In the event that worthy of is actually not the case, no extra logic or JavaScript/CSS info was invoked by element.